I read “Return of Kings” sometimes, though I disagree with many of the sentiments expressed there. One thing they seem hung up on is how “feminists” have rigged it so that women can get away with things that men can’t and that women are held to a different standard than men. As if it has ever been any different.
Of late they lament the fate of an Ohio State Student who very publicly performed cunnilingus on his date while being filmed on somebody’s phone. When the girl–who at no point seems to be coerced or in distress–sobered up a bit and realized her parents might see what a disgusting pig of a human she is when she’s not being supervised, she cried rape.
The trashy idiot kneeling in front of her and BRAGGING about how he has no shame at all (between licks) is being portrayed as some sort of victim by the so-called “manosphere.”
Well, here at Toiletnation, we’d say they are BOTH victims of a multi-faceted social failure. What are some probable characteristics of our performers?
- Probably unchurched.
- Probably raised by indulgent, spineless wimps.
- Probably raised with televisions and computers in their bedrooms.
- Probably raised with the notion that “being responsible” means having a condom or the number of the nearest Planned Parenthood.
One hundred years ago, this wouldn’t have happened for various reasons. Let’s recount them.
1. Neither one of these two apes would have had enough means or intelligence to be considered possible college students. He’d be driving a street car or hauling ice and she’d be a housewife with three kids. Which is where they obviously belong.
2. Men and women would not be drinking together.
3. Men and women who weren’t married would not be unchaperoned.
4. The “crowd” would have intervened at the moral outrage and police would have been summoned. They would not have clapped and cheered and hooted like chimpanzees.
Here are some rules they would have been expected to abide by in the late 1800s and early 1900s. As you read them, think about how they might have kept these two shitbags out of trouble:
Should never remove his coat while standing, sitting, riding, or walking with a lady.
Shall never ask a lady to dance if he has his coat removed.
Shall lift his hat and say Excuse Me when he brushes against a lady on the street.
Should always walk on the outside when walking with one or more ladies.
Shall not hold a ladies arm, except when support is needed.
Shall remove his hat while talking to a lady.
When a gentleman is seated in a restaurant and a lady acquaintance enters and bows the gentleman should return the bow while he remains seated, if the lady stops at his table the gentleman shall rise and remain standing till she departs.
But such rules are just funny and quaint, now. But keep rules like this in mind the next time you think about putting yourself in a situation where someone’s regret may lead you both into court.
A Note About Chaperones
At one time, dating or courting couples were chaperoned to protect the lady’s reputation from slanderous gossip. Now, it may be a good idea to have one to protect the man from legal trouble and false accusation.
Sorry I’m gone so much these days. This is my second challenging semester in a row and I have to publish before the end of the year. And, as always, I’m distractible.
Anyway, I sat in on a talk a week or so back about some regional efforts in the United States meant to increase “wellness markers” among the populations of various states and cities. As a resident of one of the fattest, unhealthiest states in the union, we’ll try anything to work on our ongoing obesity problem.
As part of the planning, the usual think-tank types have been getting together to discuss possibly putting “Blue Zone” measures/clubs in place around the state, as some other states are doing with varied success, though it isn’t certain yet whether these efforts are just more wasted time and/or taxpayer money.
Anyway, the ‘Blue Zone” thing is based on the work of Dan Buettner, a guy who, continuing the work of some ethnologists doing longevity studies for the National Geographic Society a few years ago, has identified some regions of the world where people live markedly longer and healthier lives than most other places.
Read more here (excuse my linking to Wikipedia): Wikipedia Entry: Blue Zone
As I listened, the very enthusiastic representative of Louisiana’s Health and Hospitals discussed those things that healthy populations and regions have in common:
- They put personal lives ahead of all else
- They don’t use tobacco
- They don’t eat red meat very often
- Fish is eaten regularly (they don’t split hairs over fish/meat)
- They drink alcohol regularly, but in moderation
- They have some sort of spirituality
- They have extended circles of friends
- Exercise is worked into their lives seamlessly (they walk everywhere or row boats for fishing, etc.)
- They eat beans and grains far more than meat
Then, the lady listed the official Blue Zone areas:
- Sardinia, Italy
- Okinawa, Japan
- Loma Linda, CA
- Icaria, Greece
- Nicoya, Costa Rica
Remember, these are places where people live happily and live to be very old.
Now, they had no idea an undercover WN was in the audience, but I sat there Googling these places on my iPad with the very first question that occurred to me…Guess what I immediately suspected and immediately found to be true:
1. None of them are in Africa or the Muslim world
2. These places are overwhelmingly lacking in diversity
3. In those areas with MORE diversity, blacks are “underrepresented”.
The lack of diversity of most of the places listed is well-documented and has even been studied.
Here is a quote from an article in the International Journal of Modern Anthropology titled “Sardinian Population: A Genetic Review“:
“A high degree of internal heterogeneity was also found and it can be attributed first to strict isolation and consequent high levels of endogamy and consanguinity, secondly, to selective factor linked to endemic malaria that influenced the distribution of some gene frequencies. Finally an influence on Sardinian’s biological history could be attributed to the demographic events such as low population density and scant matrimonial movement, which triggered off phenomena of genetic drift.”
In other words, they’re all cousins and it has allowed their genes to develop in a way beneficial to their survival. No immigrants.
It sort of flies in the face of “Our Diversity is our Strength” nonsense.
Even Loma Linda, the “Blue Zone” with the highest degree of diversity has mostly Whites and Asians and few blacks. So “diversity” per se is less dangerous to the collective health of a given population than the presence of those of Negroid descent. The reasons are legion, I’m sure, not least among them the stress that comes from having the crime rates and other social burdens that the presence of those of African descent bring…
Also, it seems strange that Muslims, representing one billion residents of our planet, aren’t better represented. Perhaps all those suicide bombings and inter-tribal civil wars keep them from making it to 100 with any regularity…Maybe we can grade Muslims on a curve. If they make it to 40, they’re really 100 in civilized human being years. Relax. Just kidding.
But what becomes apparent when reading about the Blue Zones with a race-conscious and critical eye is that what ISN’T in these areas is as important as what is, and it has a health impact that can be measured.
And, remember. Without immigration, colonization, travel and “diversity,” we might arguably be healthier as a species.
Learning From History & The News: World War One, America’s Golden Dawn and the Coming American Racial Conflagration
World War One is one of the hardest subjects to teach at the university level because its causes are, to the modern student, absolutely nonsensical. Words like “empire” and “nationalism” have to be pretty thoroughly and carefully defined before the lessons can even move forward because most students aged 18 to 23 don’t truly understand what they mean. Most students seem to have “nationalism” and “patriotism” mixed up and, thus, when a chapter heading in a book about the history of the West from 1877 to 1939 says “The Rise of Nationalism,” they are often puzzled about how that might contribute to the start of a war in which millions die.
But, as we know, it did, it can, it does and it will again. Here.
The United States today is very much like the Balkans were under the Austro-Hungarian Empire. We have hundreds–not dozens–hundreds of racial groups, ethnic groups, languages, religions, sects, political philosophies, economic classes, sub-classes and regional subcultures on our patch(es) of the North American continent. Many of these groups, sects and classes necessarily, historically and eternally work at cross purposes and, were a strong dissuading force like the Federal Government to disappear or significantly weaken, they would probably fight and kill each other in pretty short order if enough of a crisis were to come along.
Another sobering similarity between Europe 1913 and USA 2013 is the pervasiveness of “non-representative imperialism.” The Serbs were Slavs and, as Slavic racial awareness increased in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, so did the political chafing by Slavs at the fact that they were not politically closer to the Russian Empire, an empire of a more Slavic nature that the Austro-Hungarian House of Habsburg. As the A.H. Empire came to serve the interests of its Serbians less and less under the flip and arrogant Franz Ferdinand (who held the Serbs in pretty open contempt as “pigs”), the murmurs of Serbo-Slavic Nationalism became a political roar. It can be repeatedly seen as an historical truth that, for whatever reason, people don’t live peacefully or contentedly for very long under rulers that don’t reflect their racial or ethnic identity, especially when those rulers lose the ability to keep discontent to a minimum. At that point, client groups would rather live in civil war and squalor under their own kind than in relative progress and peace under Whitey. (SEE ALSO: The Entire African Continent).
In that vein, a sort of political imperialism exists here in America. Minorities are served under the “empire” of the center-left progressivism of the Democrats. The traditional White majority’s interests are served–though much less robustly everyday–by the center-right conservatism of the Republicans. If an empire’s health is apparent by the unity of its constituents, the Democrats are winning this miniature, political World War One here in the US; the tide seems to have turned pretty decisively in their favor. Whether this is a long-term political trend or not is hard to say. The demographic rot of America hints that it may be. Maybe.
The loose linchpin in the progressive’s wheel is the ability to keep giving gifts. The political potlatch that keeps ghetto-dwellers and those programmed to be discontented voting for the usual gang is based upon the productive power of the economy it’s stolen from. In the case of the US, that power is waning and, as that power obviously wanes at the same time that our national politics have become embarrassingly bush league, our perceived ability to repay debts is lessened and we will have a harder time getting credit. And the spiral downward, if unchecked, will increase in speed. At the rate we are going, we will have our own “Greek Debt Crisis” before we get spending and the hemorrhaging of industry under control. But I’m betting it will be exponentially worse than what has happened in Greece. It’s a matter of inertia.
If that is indeed the case, I fully expect an openly and unabashedly pro-White, anti-immigration force to emerge on the right within the next ten years and I expect that force to be very popular. Whatever person or party this is and however the reaction to him/her/it goes will be the precursor to a very difficult and potentially violent period in American political history.
And I believe we will all be alive to see it.
Something to keep in mind. Be prepared for post-firing combat in self-defense situations. Have enough gun for the job.
The following video shows the REALITYof a human being’s ability to function after being fatally shot. The perp, John Van Allen, was shot once in the chest with a .40 Caliber pistol from a distance of no more than 15 feet. He manages to continue fighting after being hit, getting off several shots at Oregon State Trooper, Matt Zistel, wounding the trooper once in the side. The perp then runs to his car, opens the door and drives 1/2 mile, pulls over to the shoulder and dies.
Trooper Zistel was transported to a local hospital for his single gunshot wound, where he made a full recovery.
At the time of the shooting, Allen had his 3 children in the car, none of them were hurt thankfully. Relatives have no ideal what would possess Allen to act this way. Allen worked as a Construction Engineer in the US Army Reserves…
View original post 457 more words