Read it and weep:
“So I went back to the source, compiled the original data and mapped it out on the infographic above. In the bluer countries, fewer people said they would not want neighbors of a different race; in red countries, more people did.”
Notice, dear reader, that the residents of Europe, the United States and Australia all seem, for the most part, to be very open to having neighbors of a different race. But notice also that NIGERIA is one of the more racist places on Earth. West Africa in general looks pretty hostile to DIVERSITY. And where are there the MOST racists?
No. Not South Africa. Nope. Not Rhodesia.
It’s INDIA. The inventor, the original HOME of “diversity.” I’m not surprised at all. If there is any country, any society, any history on Earth that proves that diversity causes violence, hatred, warfare and rot, it’s India. Also, if any country on Earth proves that robust White Rule can help backwards and benighted dirt-squatters achieve civilization, it’s India.
Here. Read about it.
Quote: “India is characterized by more ethnic and religious groups than most other countries of the world. Aside from the much noted 2000-odd castes, there are eight “major” religions, 15-odd languages spoken in various dialects in 22 states and nine union territories, and a substantial number of tribes and sects.”
But, overall, according to the same Swedish study the above map was based on, affluence and economic freedom do NOT make the individuals in a country more accepting of funny-looking foreigners. It does, however, make them more accepting of Sodomites.
Foreign Policy Blog: Countries with more open economies are less homophobic, but not less racist
“I’m not sure the argument that people in liberalized economies are more tolerant only to those who are not perceived as an economic threat is really all that encouraging, though with anti-immigrant political sentiment rising in many western countries at the same time that laws protecting gay rights and same-sex marriage are becoming more widespread, it does have a ring of truth about it. “
Of course it does. And it makes perfect sense.
Sodomites are culturally corrosive in their own way when they become politically ascendant, but they, as a general rule, don’t take over neighborhoods, reproduce like rabbits, drive down property values, demand unequal school funding in their ghettos and deny responsibility for their failures. They are also not well-known for robbing, beating, raping, rioting or forming violent drug gangs. So, though I may have given a picture to the contrary in the past, I consider native homosexuals solid gold bars of decency compared to the slum dwellers of Detroit or the jabbering immigrants of East L.A.
So on a scale of 0-10 with “0” being calm, blonde Dutchmen gardening vegetables behind their communal house and “10” being !Kung Bushmen high on crack and armed with shotguns and machetes in my neighborhood, my scale of “get out of my neighborhood” looks like this: