Toiletnation, USA

Home » Uncategorized » Progressives Cannot Have My Children

Progressives Cannot Have My Children

Marxists don’t think much of the Western notion of “family.” They never have, and they’ve never tried to hide their disdain. At first, they “analyzed” the “development” of the family as a mere offshoot of “social reproduction.” They did so in the belief that the emotional ties that Western man has to family and clan might loosen if he were exposed to the historical “evolution” of the family from loosely bunched savages to the disintegrating (but still existent) nuclear family of Western Europeans. Engels explains our idea of family as–no joke–a transitional form between “upper and middle stages of barbarism.”

As well as overestimating the willingness of the working class to read such leaden radical nonsense, Marxists overestimated the average prole’s eagerness to engage in things like “group marriage” and “free love.”

In Section 2 of the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels, using the very dramatic prose of teenage boys–complete with exclamations and obnoxious rhetorical questions– wrote:

“Abolition (repeal) of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

“On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.”

So your family is just a bullshit social structure designed to make it easier for Bill Gates to make money off of  you. Or for Bill Gates to keep money in his family.

As I’ve said before, Westen Civilization’s intransigence in the face of Marxist “fact” has long been a source of frustration for Communists who, generation after generation, try to make their horseshit palatable and then stand there dumbfounded when the Rednecks throw them out of the honky tonk.

From an excellent 1994 essay by Richard Weikart:

In [Das] [K]apital, Marx pronounced as silly any absolutising of the family, since it had developed through historical stages. In The German Ideology Marx and Engels asserted, ‘It is not possible to speak of ‘the’ family’. Although they never sketched out the historical stages of the family in their pre-Morgan days, they did touch on some of the effects of the family on subsequent history. The family, in fact, played an important, though malevolent, role in the early history of humanity, according to Marx and Engels.”

Malevolent? Why malevolent? The answer is because, as the Frankfurt School later fleshed out, the prejudices, superstitions, hatreds and loyalties of the bourgeois societal architects are passed along through the family. In other words, “the family” is a barrier to Communism. Any Leftist efforts to weaken the traditional family must be viewed through this lens.

From the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (entry on F.S. Marxist Theodor Adorno):

Principally, the [Frankfurt] School began to question, and ultimately reject, the strict economic determinism to which orthodox Marxism was enthralled at the time. This coincided with a firm belief amongst the members of the School that social phenomena, such as culture, mass entertainment, education, and the family played a direct role in maintaining oppression. Marxists had typically dismissed the importance of such phenomena on the grounds that they were mere reflections of the underlying economic basis of the capitalist mode of production. An undue concern for such phenomena was thus generally thought of as, at best, a distraction from the real task of overthrowing capitalism, at worst a veritable hindrance. In contrast, the Frankfurt School argued that such phenomena were fundamentally important, in their own right.”

No, I am not an Evangelical Christian and I’m not making this up. Communists have very boldly stated this opinion for 130 years.

What, then, would Marxists do with children? Well, they also told us that. Erich Fromm–the King of the Freudo-Marxists wrote of child-rearing:

” Healthy human development makes it necessary that a child eventually cut the primary ties which connect him with his father and mother, or with later substitutes in society, and that he become truly independent. He must learn to face the world as an individual. He must learn to find his security not in any symbiotic attachment, but in his capacity to grasp the world intellectually, emotionally, artistically. He must use all his powers to find union with the world, rather than to find security through submission or domination.”

And Ur-Bolshevik Alexandra Kollontai wrote:

Communist society considers the social education of the rising generation to be one of the fundamental aspects of the new life. The old family, narrow and petty, where the parents quarrel and are only interested in their own offspring, is not capable of educating the “new person”. The playgrounds, gardens, homes and other amenities where the child will spend the greater part of the day under the supervision of qualified educators will, on the other hand, offer an environment in which the child can grow up a conscious communist who recognises the need for solidarity, comradeship, mutual help and loyalty to the collective. What responsibilities are left to the parents, when they no longer have to take charge of upbringing and education? The very small baby, you might answer, while it is still learning to walk and clinging to its mother’s skirt, still needs her attention. Here again the communist state hastens to the aid of the working mother. No longer will there be any women who are alone. The workers’ state aims to support every mother, married or unmarried, while she is suckling her child, and to establish maternity homes, day nurseries and other such facilities in every city and village, in order to give women the opportunity to combine work in society with maternity.”

So this…

…has been said before.

People like me told them “no” then, and we always will. It may take a village to raise a child, but it takes liberals to raise simpering narcissists.  And we’ve got enough of those.

So, no. Progressives cannot have my children. Don’t give them yours, either.


  1. mindweapon says:

    They already did it. They replaced the father with a welfare check. Liberal dystopian HELL is here, now. And sooner or later, we’re going to SMASH these fuckers as revenge for our destroyed childhoods and so many destroyed lives. These ivory tower scum have so much blood on their hands, they could drown in it, as in a lake.

  2. Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. Id prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you dont mind. Natually Ill give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: